Submitted by John_B on Fri, 01/17/2014 - 3:12pm

I agree this looks like the trend. However I cannot see how pushing a CMS site into static pages improves on using Boost, or a public-facing Varnish server, with a fresh cache (e.g. refreshed by crawling? An automatically rebuilt static site is in effect pushing static pages; a public-facing 'Boosted' or Varnish server in effect pulls them off the CMS backend. How is pushing static pages better than pulling them with Boost or Varnish?

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
About text formats

Plain text

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.